|
The antipassive voice (abbreviated or ) is a type of grammatical voice that either does not include the object or includes the object in an oblique case. This construction is similar to the passive voice, in that it decreases the verb's valency by one; the passive by deleting the subject and "promoting" the accusative object to a nominative subject, the antipassive by deleting the object and "promoting" the ergative agent to an absolutive subject. The antipassive voice is found in some Mayan, Salishan, Northeast Caucasian, Austronesian, and Australian languages.〔(Antipassive constructions ) Accessed 24 April, 2014〕 Only one Amazonian language, Cavineña, has the antipassive.〔Dixon, R.M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds) (1990). ''The Amazonian Languages''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.〕 The antipassive voice is found in ergative languages where the deletion of an object "demotes" the subject from ergative case to absolutive case. In certain accusative languages that have verbal agreement with both subject and object, the antipassive is usually formed by deletion of the object affix. Examples of accusative languages with this type of antipassive are Maasai, Comanche and Cahuilla. A number of direct–inverse languages also have the antipassive voice. The antipassive voice is very rare in active–stative languages generally and in nominative–accusative languages that have only one-place or no verbal agreement.〔Nichols, Johanna; Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time; pp. 154-158. ISBN 0-226-58057-1〕 There are a very few exceptions to this rule, such as Krongo〔(WALS - Krongo )〕 and the Songhay language Koyraboro Senni language,〔(WALS - Koyraboro Senni )〕 both of which rely on dedicated antipassive markers that are rare in the more typical type of language with an antipassive. :"Mary-ERG eats pie-ABS." → "Mary-ABS eats." :"He-ERG is speaking the truth-ABS." → "He-ABS is speaking." As with passive voice, the deleted argument can be re-introduced as an optional complement or oblique argument. :"Mary-ERG eats pie-ABS." → "Mary-ABS eats ''from the pie''." Antipassives frequently convey aspectual or modal information, and may cast the clause as imperfective, inceptive, or potential. The purpose of antipassive construction is often to make certain arguments available as pivots for relativization, coordination of sentences or similar constructions. For example in Dyirbal the omitted argument in conjoined sentences must be in absolutive case. Thus, the following sentence is ungrammatical: : :M-ABS man-ABS come-NFUT F-ABS woman-ABS see-NFUT :'The man came and saw the woman' In the conjoined sentence the omitted argument (the man) would have to be in ergative case, being the agent of a transitive verb (to see). This is not allowed in Dyirbal. In order to make this sentence grammatical, the antipassive, which promotes the original ergative to absolutive - and puts the former absolutive (the woman) into dative case -, has to be used: : :M-ABS man-ABS come-NFUT F-DAT woman-DAT see-APASS-NFUT :'The man came and saw the woman' ==Defining "antipassive"== The term ''antipassive'' is applied to a wide range of grammatical structures and is therefore difficult to define. R. M. W. Dixon has therefore defined four criteria for determining whether a construction is an antipassive:〔Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). ''Ergativity''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.〕 # It applies to underlying transitive clauses and form a derived intransitive. # The underlying Agent becomes Subject. # The underlying Object goes into the periphery and is marked by a non-core case/preposition/etc. This can be omitted, but there's always the option of including it. # There is some explicit marking of the construction. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「antipassive voice」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|